Anonymised case

Indicators and dashboards for social monitoring

Structuring of data and indicators so that foundations and associations can better manage, report on and explain their impact.

Client type
Social organisations and public-interest projects
Technologies
PostgreSQLSupabaseReactRechartsRShinyGoogle SheetsCSV

Problem

There was data on activity, people, projects and territory, but no integrated view for senior management, teams and funders.

Constraints

  • Sources with different formats and levels of quality.
  • Need for indicators that non-technical people can understand.
  • Separation between internal reporting and public communication.
  • Changes of criteria while the model was being defined.

What was done

  • Definition of indicators and reporting structure.
  • Preparation of clean views and datasets for visualisation.
  • Dashboards and visualisations with React, Recharts, R/Shiny and spreadsheets where they fitted.
  • Documentation of criteria so that the team understands what each indicator measures.

Governance and security

  • Traceability between source data, indicator and visualisation.
  • Anonymisation or aggregation criteria where the data requires it.
  • Separation between public and operational views.

What it demonstrates

  • Ability to translate social activity into useful data.
  • Understanding of reporting for senior management, funders and operational teams.
  • A focus on decisions, not decorative dashboards.

Result

Teams were able to move from manual counts to a more objective conversation about activity, coverage, trends and data needs.

Does this fit your situation?

Briefly describe the operational, data or AI problem. The first reply can help to guide the type of diagnostic.

Assistant · IA

Open full page

Answer generated by AI from the site content. It may contain errors; it is not an offer and does not replace a conversation. Please do not enter personal data.